Allison has over 10 years of experience designing programs and policies and conducting evaluations on a range of social issues, including neighborhood revitalization, childhood asthma education, and behavioral health care ethics. Allison is a former ideas42 alumna, having left the organization to spend two years leading community initiatives and investments at the United Way of Greater New Bedford in Massachusetts.
See also 'Media' page for Lupron in the news. Digestive Diseases and Sciences, 40 6: Because a PubMed search of this citation does not identify or include Mathias' comment and produces only author "Drossman's" comment pagethe above statement by Mathias et al.
See " Chronic intestinal pseudo-obstruction due to buserelin-induced formation of anti-GnRH antibodies ". And consider the posted comment from one lupron GI clinical trial participant whose results have apparently not made it into any subsequent published medical literature.
Despite 40 years and millions of patients, the long-term safety of GnRHa's has undergone little investigation. And to quote a comment by Dr. In the FDA conducted an investigation into the adverse events reported for lupron: Small, isolated studies over the years have been done - i.
And, to name just a few, safety label changes have added hepato-biliary disorders, interstitial lung disease, and convulsions to lupron's label. The first comprehensive look at GnRHa-induced depression and suicide took place in in the EUwith the recommendation that all GnRH analogs' product information identify that "the risk of depression and mood changes should be mentioned and warnings should be included, in a consistent manner and for all indications, in the product information of all medical products in the EU containing a GnRH agonist.
For further details on the censure of the results of this study, see post below, at the 'Noteworthy News' entry, which is dated "rec'd December ". This FDA safety review identified there are "no known comparable studies that have evaluated the risks of diabetes and heart disease in women and children taking GnRHa's.
Also ina database search identified that men on long-term androgen deprivation therapy "ADT" - consisting of GnRHa's had an increased risk of colorectal cancer ; and a similar database review of men's prostate cancer ADT treatment concluded an elevation in risk of cataracts.
I have been writing to the FDA since see 'Letters' for additional communications and FDA responses ; in I submitted a detailed draft outline to the Assistant US Attorney subsequently provided to the FDA's Office of Criminal Investigation concerning the serious problems related to lupron's clinical trials, including cardiovascular events see specifically: See also letter to FDA Commisioner.
It should be noted that the first reported case of angina and myocardial infarction heart attack in a woman using lupron was published inand the potential risk of GnRH agonists causing an increased risk of coronary artery disease in women was raised in in this article about the use of GnRHa's to treat premenstrual syndrome it is stated "Clinicians and patients must be aware that this [GnRHa] therapy is an extreme therapeutic measure; medical castration may increase the patient's risk of osteoporosis and coronary artery disease.
And there have been several other reports of women having a heart attack during leuprolide's off-label use in ovulation induction. As ofthe following adverse events had been reported to the FDA from women using lupron: In the meantime, THOUSANDS of women have requested and are requesting an investigation into the wide-ranging and long-term physical side effects often debilitating of lupron For additional information and other links to US petitions requesting an investigation and ban of lupron, as well as a lupron petition from France all detailing sad horror stories post-lupronsee 'Links page'.
And take note that Dr. Gueriguian a former FDA Medical Officer involved with the initial FDA approval of lupron for pallliative treatment of prostate cancer has stated more recently in his capacity as an expert medical witness in a female lupron product liability lawsuit that "Lupron causes irreversible side effects and permanent severely disabling health problems.
Considering the number of women who've taken these drugs [lupron] over the past 25 years, you'd think much more rigorous studies and analysis would have been done on them.
In order to halt this drug from causing damage to even one more woman's health, a concerted effort of women, physicians, health officials, researchers and media is needed. The people who are considering taking Lupron are the ones who have the right to know that they are risking a lifetime of symptoms that may cost them their jobs, spouses, savings and quality of life.
Why no FDA investigation into the effects on women?
Why no Congressional investigations into lupron see 'Links' page? Why no "concerted effort" of "women, physicians, health officials, researchers and media"????? On December 28, Dr.
|Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act - Wikipedia||He worked in the George W.|
|BibMe: Free Bibliography & Citation Maker - MLA, APA, Chicago, Harvard||The Cost of Child Marriage Development experts have always measured the human costs of early marriage, but new data are shedding light on the practice's economic impact. However, in most developing countries, change is not occurring fast enough and funding for this cause is inadequate.|
David Redwine posted on Facebook's Lupron Victims page the following paragraph: A year ago, I completed a very detailed review of the original studies which brought Lupron to market. The review was based on the studies which were entered as exhibits in the Klein case in Las Vegas in Augustalthough the plaintiff was not allowed to discuss the studies!!
I found evidence of systematic 'data management issues' - the raw data did not always support the conclusions. In fact the raw data virtually never supported the major conclusions, but this was glossed over in summary tables and summary discussions, which were probably all the FDA had time and manpower to look at.
I sent the review to the FDA a year ago. They have reassured me in emails over the last year that they are looking into my concerns and will let me know when they completed their review.
INTRODUCTION: While new studies on the negative effects of pesticides on human health are completed each year by major government and university research centers, the majority of these studies remain "silent" in medical journals and do not reach the public via major news grupobittia.com reduction in public awareness appears to have worsened over the past several decades. Measure Subject Author Status; AB-1 Transportation funding. Frazier: Assembly - Died - Transportation: AB-2 Hate crimes: peace officers. Obernolte: Assembly - Died - Public Safety. The Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act of (Pub.L. –, Stat. , enacted November 5, , 18 U.S.C. § , PBA Ban) is a United States law prohibiting a form of late termination of pregnancy called "partial-birth abortion," referred to in medical literature by as intact dilation and extraction. Under this law, "Any physician who, in or affecting interstate or foreign commerce.
A review that a single doctor compiled in 4 months has languished in the bowels of the FDA for over a year. It is time for women who have victims of Lupron to write the FDA and demand toknow what is happening with this review.
Martin Kaufman is the person at the FDA who has been corresponding with me. His email address is: I have contacted my Oregon US Senators, and have given them the information in the review and asked them to prod the FDA, but only one of them wrote backA paper on the Reproductive Health Bill in Philippines 1.
Introduction As of , Philippines has a population of ,, people, making it the twelfth most populated country in the world. INTRODUCTION: While new studies on the negative effects of pesticides on human health are completed each year by major government and university research centers, the majority of these studies remain "silent" in medical journals and do not reach the public via major news grupobittia.com reduction in public awareness appears to have worsened over the past several decades.
The Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act of (Pub.L. –, Stat. , enacted November 5, , 18 U.S.C.
§ , PBA Ban) is a United States law prohibiting a form of late termination of pregnancy called "partial-birth abortion," referred to in medical literature by as intact dilation and extraction.
Under this law, "Any physician who, in or affecting interstate or foreign commerce. Within the context of work on reproductive health, the political challenges of development practice are compounded by the need to manage globalised opposition to reproductive health rights, which similarly seeks to influence donor-recipient country policy.
“In selecting Judge Brett Kavanaugh for the Supreme Court, President Trump has put reproductive rights and freedoms and health care protections for millions of Americans on the judicial chopping. The Responsible Parenthood and Reproductive Health Act of (Republic Act No.
), informally known as the Reproductive Health Law or RH Law, is a law in the Philippines, which guarantees universal access to.