How do you empty a vase containing four flowers? How do you empty a vase containing three flowers? How do you empty a vase containing two flowers?
Petro September 14, at These days there seems to be at least one implementation of that idea—bountysource. Anything you can write a clear acceptance criteria for that one or more people want.
Since this project was derived from research on existing crowdfunding platforms such as Kickstarter, I already had the sense that in principle nearly anything goes.
I was thinking about what would happen if proposals could be linked in some way such that users could allow an incentive pool or some part thereof to be offered to whoever finished any one of the related projects.
For example, if one backer wanted a utility knife with certain functions, a second backer wanted one with similar but not identical functions, and a third backer felt that either of these projects would satisfy their need.
Would that have implementation challenges? This can either lead to efforts spent on metagaming, or to general frustration, in arbitrary combinations.
In your model users do not know the timeframe. Will it be precommitment to selected date? Can commitment be extended? What information do you reveal about pool size evolution?
Allowing backers to leave the pool freely would lead to tragedy of the commons type problems. I think backers could be individually allowed to choose the duration of their bid, but that if so this must be set beforehand. If nothing meets the spec in this timeframe, you get your money back.
Some kind of reward system to incentivize longer bids? Definitely options to renew. This seems like a headache for creators, though. Thanks for giving me stuff to research! You have to reveal the pool size at least at some reasonable points in future according to current commitmentsbecause for some things one-month commitments make sense, and for some things one-year commitments are too short — you should assume that only creators can distinguish such things, and then you have to give them information for such a decision.
A note on transaction costs — charging then refunding has a cost, you probably want to pass it to users explicitly, and this means that you should provide a very clear path both to get a refund and to move the refund into a different pool.
The latter option, of course, is better for the user transaction-cost-wise.Para saber mais sobre as normas e compromissos que atendemos confira nossas certificações.
Sep 21, · This is the monthly?
classified thread. Post advertisements, personals, and any interesting success stories from the last thread. Lesson Summary.
Much like a chef using a serrated knife to cut bread and a paring knife to peel vegetables, computer programmers choose from a variety of flow charts to help them get their job. Recommended Prep: ACCT 20 or BCIS 85 and Reading Level IV; English Level III; Math Level III or MATH or concurrent enrollment Transfer Status: CSU/UC 68 hours Lecture.
This is the study of accounting as an information system, examining why it is important and how it is used by investors, creditors, and others to make decisions. I'm having major trouble understanding recursion at school. Whenever the professor is talking about it, I seem to get it but as soon as I try it on my own it completely blows my brains.
This subpage of the Manual of Style contains guidelines for writing and editing clear, encyclopedic, attractive, and interesting articles on mathematics and for the use of mathematical notation in Wikipedia articles on other subjects.
For matters of style not treated on this subpage, follow the main Manual of Style and its other subpages to achieve consistency of style throughout Wikipedia.